The word 'Wahhabi' writing in the West have different descriptions. All lead to the flow of Islam viewed as evidences to hold al-Quran and al-Sunnah literally and refused to see a more modern interpretation or interpretation of a rather 'western influence'. Clinton Bennet enter 'wahhabis' Deobandis and below groups 'traditionalists' which means that once under the flow of 'fundamentalist' (see: Muslims and Modernity 18-20, London: Continuum).
Some Western view of writing as a flow that considers Wahhabi 'Islam is the religion of truth', must uphold the 'Islamic State', there is 'jihad' against the kuffar and other characteristics of the elements considered 'desert' once associated with attempted terrorism.
In Malaysia, the word 'Wahhabi' is the word mystery. What least, people who call or defamation others using the word, but they do not understand. For them, it is a weapon to defend yourself when criticized. I still remember, at one place in the North, when there are priests who charge for prayer and recital, he criticized the abuse of religious attitudes to self-interest, he simply replied: "who disagree with me he Wahhabi". Adviser probably not exposed to a lot of information and first heard the word is, terpinga-pinga asked: "what is a Wahhabi?". Reply tok imam: "Who is he criticizing ustaz Wahhabi". But the brave 'advisers' opinion that differs with the 'tok imam' questioning and 'infallibility' ustaz, so afraid Wahhabi.
In some places a person accused Wahhabi practices as opposed to superstition. For example, pause the slideshow or a particular person as the sultan teacher beliefs can add to the profit or income, or tie a black thread in the hands of a newborn faith rejects the transmission or demolition and the haunted part of nonsense various communities. Unfortunately these practices not only get the blessings that some called 'Ustaz', but they cause. If there is criticized, to defend themselves then 'sang Ustaz' is easily the mention: 'you Wahhabi'.
Similarly, those who do not agree with the late feast accused Wahhabism. Even though the old Malay kitab al-Talab Bughyah essay Sheikh Daud al-Fatani itself states: "(and makruh) more bid'ah death for those who make the food people eat all menserukan whether he planted before him and after him as awarded most people (and thus more) makruh more bid'ah for all that he listens to answer the call ". If they can not accept their own material, why they feel themselves Infallible, and forbid others to use them with different weapons 'you Wahhabi'.
Some religious groups, they read and spread the history-history that pushed; Israliyyat as the conflict with the evidences of Islam, hadith or false stories or Sufi saint who makes people confused about the sophistication of Islam. They distribute in the talks and make some capital for 'business' them. Islam became blurred with the stories and the cause of this great religion seems like a 'cartoon' and 'high quality'. If there is a rebuke of the speakers; answer 'you Wahhabi'. Although the fiscal was never even read the book of Muhammad bin 'Abdul Wahhab.
Worse when the issues used by the Wahhabi religious authority. If public officials or the religion that they sealiran with bertarekat, or readers hadith false and comedy, but any teacher who taught only the Quran and authentic Hadith and do not agree with the confusion that will be listed as Wahhabism and forbids teaching in mosque and prayer room. Name sultan will be used.
At the same time they leave a clear disobedience here and there, then sibukkan with revivalist groups that do not threaten society altogether. If you have it, the threat is thought to kejumudan and conservatism, not to society. To justify busy with this group until they left intrinsic disobedience, they said: "This is dangerous because Wahhabi". What is Wahhabism? Answer their Wahhabi Wahhabism is! This attitude became more heat when the emergence in Malaysia 'flow kuffar nation' called Ahbash that associating with some religious parties.
At a higher level, the term Wahhabism applies to those who are not bound by al-Shafi'i sect. Apparently, those who do not follow the Wahhabi sect. I have called evidences of scholars about this in the articles of the past.
Exactly as mentioned by Dr al-Qaradawi:
"Among the taksub does not allow those who follow a sect out of it, even though some problems in a clear proof that the sect followers mazhabnya weak. Until they described as a sect out anyone who does not berpendirian. This act requires that any fact that is not prescribed by Allah "(Dr. Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Al-al-Islamiyyah Sahwah bain al-difference al-Masyru 'wa al-Tafarruq al-Mazmum, p. 202, Cairo: Dar al - Sahwah).
What is interesting in Malaysia, some of 'their' when the 'advisors' bank, to meet the needs of banks operating in the name of Islam, they also agree with the views taken without regard to law sect. Even the views Syeikhul Islam Ibn Taimiyyah rh taken so many problems in this Transactions. This is because, throughout the world views he had always been collected in advance of the Muslim community. Even though 'some of these' meetings outside the bank ber'elaun ', they accuse Ibn Taimiyyah Wahhabi, and anyone who agrees with Ibn Taimiyyah as' Wahhabism'. Even outside their banks in cahoots with those calls or misleading Ibn Taimiyyah.
So when I first became classics, when I give Padangan prohibition spying (tajassus), can not say salam muslim, compulsory membinkan father to his father even though the original non-Muslim mosque for Chinese people, an area to receive views and others, the opinion - this view accused by some religious parties as a Wahhabi. Though the opinion discussed in the West if considered in the flow of Modernism or rationalism and opponents may be added to the group of Wahhabism.
In Malaysia, on the contrary, that opens the Wahhabi and error, that is a closed 'membolot Truth'. Here's how to think that dominate sectors of government and religion hurry 'decay' of government power that is. How to think that way too controlling the flow of some religion in opposition. That is why perhaps, fifty years of independence, non-Muslims not only do not understand the increase, but increases tension and confusion about Islam.
Actions they remind me to this article entitled Fundamentalisn David Brubaker vs. Modernism: A Consideration of causal Conditions that resistance against reform refers to the problem of survival over the group. In an effort to continue to live and a place in society and government then the reform will be resisted. For me, the issue is not actually Wahhabi, but worry ignorance place and position. However, when they feel there is room for 'position' issues such as banking earlier, they can also receive different views without accusing the bank gives a monthly allowance and allowances meeting as' bank Wahhabi sect.
David Brubaker mentioned for survival they had to choose between two 'occomodation or resistance'. So, in that many Malaysian accused of Wahhabism, but it is alleged mystery. I also have not denied that Wahhabism is considered to compromise itself in part opinion. However, to accuse other people just because Wahhabi dissent, it is the attitude of trying to live in the Adam's apple era of globalization.
